So you actually believe Micro$oft will be better
Enjoy the higher cost and dropped calls on AT&T
Because you replaced the "S" in Microsoft with a "$", I have now seen the light...geez, what is this, 2002? Android has flaws too and you know it. At least the Windows Phone platform isn't rank with fragmentation like Android is. Hell even their own Nexus devices are fragmented.
All blatant fanboyism aside, I've had Sprint for over 6 years now. I suffered through the Instinct, Instinct s30, and Samsung Moment, until they finally got a decent Android handset, the HTC EVO (which is probably the best Android phone ever, IMO). I then decided I would get a Nexus S 4G since the EVO wasn't going to be getting Ice Cream Sandwhich, and the NS4G would, at least according to the Android team at Google.
It is now 2 months since the GN was released, and still no Ice Cream Sandwich (officially) on my device. This is a terrible pattern I'm seeing with Android, and I'm done with it, and the accompanying frustration. They can't even control fragmentation on the ONE PHONE that they have complete control over (Nexus). Do you need
proof?
Sprint has better plans/prices than AT&T, that much is true, but we all know it's just a matter of time before Sprint becomes just like AT&T and VZW.
As for the mobile experience, I honestly prefer Windows Phone to Android, and I've used Android for well over 2 years (since it came to Sprint). For me, Windows Phone is better. It works. I don't need a ton of apps. I have a core set of apps that I use, and they are available on both platforms. It's not a matter of whether one is better than the other, to me, it's what works for me. Sprint doesn't want to carry Windows Phone, so I'll go to a carrier that will.
At least I can buy an AT&T phone and put it on T-Mobile's network. It's about choice for me. Sprint doesn't want to give me a choice, then I'll go to a carrier that gives me what I want.