A little OT but it really bugs me. Why are people's two and one year old smartphones on their last legs?
We pay at least $200 for these phones and as in my case usually more (full retail). THEY SHOULD LAST LONGER!
I have old flip phones that are 5+ years old and they work fine. I realize these smart phones are more advanced hence more things to go wrong but technology is also more advanced so why the big step back in longevity?
I just feel If they only allow us to upgrade at a subsidized price every two years the equipment should be able to make it.
I know I will get flamed but if I owned VZW I would allow you to upgrade every six months at a subsidized price. If you did upgrade it would subsequently reset your contract therefore locking you in longer. WIN WIN
Keep in mind, the average person USES their smartphone about 10 times more in those 2 years then most people used their old flip phones in 5 years. I'm on my DROID inc. probably 2-3 hours a DAY.
It's still in "good" shape, except for the battery, which is another thing a battery loses 20-30% of its capacity over 2-3 years. When your phone sat there in "stand-by" for 5-6 days and now it only lasts 4-5 that's not a big deal. When your smart phone that lasted maybe 8-10 is now lasting 6-7 that's a lot more noticeable.
With the exception of my work computer, my cell(computer) phone is by FAR my most used piece of electronics.
Upvote
0