Lol your wrong again cupcake. Just because an organization says something, doesn't make it a fact. But keep posting your links to Marketing Jargon, Blog Sites, and other things. This is amusing.
And backwards compatibility =/= "Natural Progression"
"Natural Progression" would be building on to and existing network, not building brand new. New infrastructure needed from the ground up, then it is not a progression of the existing technology in anyway shape or form.
If they through backwards compatibility into WinMo7 ---> WinMo Legacy, that wouldn't make it a "natural progression", now would it?
Look man, I just posted a link to the official GSMA site, where it says that LTE is the upgrade from HSPA and it is backwards compatible. It doesn't get anymore official than that.
Again, LTE IS THE NATURAL upgrade from HSPA+. And your ridiculous claims otherwise are laughable. Now you're arguing with the GSMA, saying they don't know about their own technologies? lol, hillarious.
Your opinion on this means nothing to me. You can say it as many times as you want, and it won't be any less BS. I already know the truth, and I posted the truth, from as official an authority as there is (the GSMA). There is just no arguing with a link to the GSMA website stating that LTE was designed to be backwards compatible with HSPA, and is the next step up from HSPA. That IS the NATURAL upgrade path, and there is no disputing that.
Post a link. You don't have one? So you're just arguing to argue when you already know you're wrong? lol, and you expect people to actually take you seriously in the future...
Upvote
0