GSM is much better than CDMA. We have both in our house. AT&T and Sprint.
At the end of the day though, you have to go with the carrier that fits your needs. Coverage, pricing, ect......
Ummmm, I've been in the radio business since 1958.
What you just said is not very substantive, because you don't have a point of reference on the signals.
Two difference carriers, two different cell sites, two different phones, and you are in a home with a lot of metal causing weird reflections of the incoming cell site signals.
To make such a determination, you must have a Cell Phone Test Analyzer and that is not a cheap instrument by any means.
"and the end of the day", it will be "the signal that provides the "Best SNR, or Signal to Noise Ratio".
You might say the "bars look the same" but the bars don't mean jack snill.... you must have knowledge of the actual dBm signal strength and look at the demodulation to see how well it fairs with the original waveform.
That said, I personally have never used my Oscilloscope to compare the output of a GSM phone versus the output of a CDMA phone.
At your home, it is the carrier that saturates the home's floor plan the strongest. That is the one that will win in the comparison contest... Move a half mile and try the same test, and quite likely the other carrier's phone will be better.
Our cell phones move about in a 3D manner, the cell towers are Land Locked with a Ball and Chain, they can't move. So when you move, it changes the signal path, and at the frequencies cell phones are operating at, you can hold up a tin cookie sheet and make a cell phone signal get worse or better. Just wave the metal pan around a bit and it will reflect that signal all over the place. The HVAC ducts in our homes are infamous for destroying the best laid plans of the engineers... all kinds of weird reflection patterns occur there....