Hey, thanks compadre.
Given that my explanation will be in the blogosphere within days, with the guys at Android Central benchmarking it on YouTube, Tech Crunch giving a stunning expose on it, Gizmodo wrapping 80 ads around the 5-point version ripped from Tech Crunch, EnGadget laying it out with 3 by 3 pictures for each point (but only once they re-order properly) 40 seconds before Tech Crunch gets there, eventually leading to the NYT's shocking revelation that the difference is exacerbated by gender and age for those holding the phone, and the WSJ questioning whether this finally explains why cell phones don't cause brain cancer (and by the way, that's true - our hands have been preventing brain tumors this whole time), and ...
And given that no one's going to credit me for finally letting this insider info go and no one's certainly going to listen to me when I have to go over what they got wrong in the translation - well - it almost gave me a conscience for a moment.
But then, I said to myself, Think of the children!
PS and BTW - Nearly 20 years ago, a similar expose of information led to me being cited in print, real name and all, as the only level-headed UFO researcher on the internet at the time, in that year's most popular book on what to find on the internet and what thrilling information awaited you on the superhighway. (I uncovered why things of that nature really happen only in New Mexico.)
I am not making that up.
I was thinking about that this morning 10 minutes after the secrets flew from my fingers - I almost went back and signed my real name. But then I thought of the legal backlash I might get into as I would, as you most certainly know, have promptly been named a party to the Apple/HTC patent wars, on both sides of fight, and decided to just let things go their own way.
PPS - I wish somebuddy would take me to a tavern and ply me with brew right about now - I'm a terror when I get bored.