Go read Beatweek magizines website.. A bunch of one sided BS. And every article he realizes is dumb or false he closes comments for that page.
Haha, I actually laughed. That's sooooo true.So, you're saying that commenting is closed for ALL pages?
Read this... about the nexus one on his website. He is ridiculous. He closed the comments on this page as well
Yes, this website is a crock. Day after day this excuse for a writer is publishing total FUD. The latest is how Apple is going to buy out Moto and terminate the Droid brand! There is just no limit to the amount of fear, uncertainty and doubt this guy spreads. It can really burn you up...
Why are you providing more page views for his ads to pay him from? It's no secret his articles are pure fanboy drivel. Stop rewarding his idiocy with ad revenue.
I got pissed the same way when I accidentally turned on Fox News last week
What happened, your mind didn't know what to do when being presented with truthful and fact based NON liberal controlled media news reporting!
Ok, as you were. Resume head in sand position...
And don't forget Comrade NOBAMA says to VOTE DEM!
Hahaha Fox news! That's a laugh! You should watch "Outfoxed - Rupert Merdochs war on journalism"
Its always consoling to know that you have previous government officers convicted of war crimes like Oliver Notrh, reporting your "fair and balanced news".
Just as other news is impartially "liberal", Faux News is impartially "right". But in truth who is willing to put aside biased opinionated propaganda driven by vested interest and call a spade a spade or criticize dishonesty and corruption wherever it exist? NO ONE
How do you take any of these people seriously?
Do research before spewing incorrect data, North was never accused of nor convicted of war crimes...
Iran?Contra affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
...quite a bit off the topic but..
Do research before spewing incorrect data, North was never accused of nor convicted of war crimes...
Iran?Contra affair - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
...quite a bit off the topic but..
I dont think a person who already claims responsibility (or "partial responsibility" if that suits you better) for a crime and then gets exonerated on a technicality changes any of the truths to which I am speaking (i.e widespread corruption on all sides driven by personal or partisan interests). If someone is satisfied to delude themselves as to the truth of a situation on the strength of technical litigative grounds fine, but that says little in the real world as to what actually goes on.
I assume by that same logic you refuse to believe that Oj Simpson killed his wife right? After all a jury of his peers heard both sides and made a decision, how could the truth not be discovered by this process?
Oliver North himself, referred to himself as a "fall guy" (someone who takes the blame so that a larger group of people involved dont have to). "Fall guy" for what? Nothing right? After all "he was never convicted".
Its very simple. Honest people conduct themselves one way, dishonest people another. It is not restricted to politics, this is going on everywhere.
Please be sane.
btw sorry for my tone. I am not trying to be an a$$. I understand you will continue to disagree with me and I am ok with that. Just sometimes I feel people are out of control with how much honor and indulge minced truths. Honesty is always unique due to its simplicity.
I never said anything about guilt or innocence. I simply stated that he was not guilty of war crimes. War crimes are, as defined by wikipedia (again)...
War crimes are "violations of the laws or customs of war"; including "murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps", "the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war", the killing of hostages, "the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity".[1]
if anything...
"He was indicted on sixteen felony counts and on May 4, 1989, he was initially convicted of three: accepting an illegal gratuity, aiding and abetting in the obstruction of a congressional inquiry, and destruction of documents (by his secretary, Fawn Hall, on his instructions)."
Those my friend, are not war crimes.
Details, details, details.
Facts are always unique due to their simplicity
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.