• After 15+ years, we've made a big change: Android Forums is now Early Bird Club. Learn more here.

SGS4 [INSTANT or ELONGATED]

indeed, but cricket tends to get crappier phones, the only perk to them is they sell their devices off contract so you can actually buy them from them, with us cellular id have to buy a phone from ebay. im not against that normally but with this kind of gamble...

im hopeing one day soon someone will find out for certain and it will open up a bunch of devices for anyone that wants em. as it is the cricket sgs3 is only $380, but im more interested in teh note 2 on metropcs.


Yeah, I would love to have a note 2 also for metro. Buy that's a lotta money to drop in a test bed.
 
Upvote 0
Are you sure whoever it is (that you mistyped) that allegedly saw this poster knows the difference between the number 3 and a 4? :rolleyes:

I can't imagine how they'd see a poster for a phone that probably doesn't even exist yet.

IF Metro is ever getting the S4, they probably don't know now whether it'll say Metro on it or T-Mo as I don't think Anyone has Any Real Insight right now whether the merger will even go through or not. I doubt Metro puts the final specs sheet into Samsung for their model of the S4 until they know if the merger happens or not. (Now they may have say 3 different possible options already to go to Samsung depending on how the merger pans out but it's FAR from panned out Yet.)

Also someone usually digs out the FCC paperwork once they approve a new phone model. There has been zippidy doodah squatola released on Any Metro S4.

I'd bet money that any possible upcoming Metro S4 poster doesn't even exist yet.

Bruce in Ocala, FL
 
Upvote 0
If you guys noticed the pattern with metro they never get the high tech phones first, they let the bigger carriers get their fill and they when retail value of the phone comes down to a certain magic number oh i dont know lets say $500 thats when metro takes the plunge. do i see the s4 launching with a premium price of $500? hell no all flagship samsung phone hit those $700-$850 numbers and theres no way metro is gonna get a phone for their customers when is its as much as a mortgage payment. Keep in mind metro took a chance by raising the price tag at $500 with taxes and all $535. they saw that metro customers were willing to pay extra for such a phone , will they continue to raise the bar maybe $600 phones? its plausible but they would need a hell of a deal from such phone companies to buy so many devices so they can make a profit. keep in mind metro cant sell phones for same wholesale prices they get it for.Only once they have earned their investment money back then some will they be able to sell phones for cheaper prices. hint metro samsung galaxy s3 was launched in october 22 2012 for the price tag of $499 why do u think now they are being sold for $399? cuz they made their investment back plus more so now every sale of the galaxy s3 is pure profit. Bottom line $700-$800 phones dont have much room for metro to make any profit so they are forced to wait till prices drop.

Really ive had my sg3 for 2 weeks and paid 500$ for it
 
Upvote 0
lol, shame we dont know if us cellular devices can be flashed to metro or not. would offer up some hope that the sgs4 could be ported over :p
The prospects look promising
1
metropcs flash in Specialty Services | eBay
 
Upvote 0
Seeing that the merger if approved is less than a month away they're probably waiting to see if the merger is approved so they can just have NewCo. secure the deal to sell the phones or if not approved they get the deal themselves. In the end it would save money & might even be better for the end user.
 
Upvote 0
I wouldn't be surprised IF Metro plans on introducing the S4 anytime soon that Sammy already has everything they need to know to build the Metro S4 and who knows may already be testing one. Stands to reason Metro would cover their bases and be ready to go whichever way the merger vote goes.

I wouldn't be holding my breath though.

Bruce in Ocala, FL
 
Upvote 0
@Gman9831
If you're implying that t-mobile and metropcs might sell the same phone, then I would be willing to bet money against it. Approving the merger is just the start. I would imagine they have at least half a year of work on the cell towers before they can even think of such things.
 
Upvote 0
@Gman9831
If you're implying that t-mobile and metropcs might sell the same phone, then I would be willing to bet money against it. Approving the merger is just the start. I would imagine they have at least half a year of work on the cell towers before they can even think of such things.

I'm betting it will be 1-2 years of tower work 'before they can even think of such things'... but, I've been proven wrong before.
I thought I was wrong once... turns out I was right all along. lol
 
Upvote 0
Hmm I think I see what you guys mean but why would it take them so long?
All they have to do is add the IMEI's for LTE to their tower database so our phones can authenticate it in places where they have LTE and then there they can shut down metropcs LTE in those places that overlap and add that capacity to the main LTE network.
Taken care of 1 network then they can have it where once there's barely any people with CDMA phones in a market (which shouldnt take too long @the current pace off migration to LTE) they can shut off the nearby CDMA towers then have a Sprint in market 3G roaming agreement till mid 2015. Then when the last CDMA tower goes off in mid 2015 they either force customers to switch phones or cancel the service which they're gonna do anyway.
Most of that is my idea and shows that it wouldn't take that long to get people off CDMA. So there's no need for different S4 versions.
 
Upvote 0
took sprint 7 years to kill the iden network of nextel and switch them to cdma. and will be 9 years in total to get it merged to were its being used for teh majority of sprints network.

Nextel had like 20mill customers when they merged with Sprint, metro has 9mill with 3mill of those already on LTE. Before the merger metro even said they think they could go full VoLTE within 4 years or so
 
Upvote 0
Here's the problem in simplified terms.
t-mobile = gsm
metropcs = cdma
the future of t-metro = lte (and probably gsm)

In the best case scenario, they could release the phone as gsm/lte.

Imagine you are a MetroPCS customer and upgrade from your SGS3 to the SGS4. Whoops! A lot of people who had coverage before (cdma areas) don't get coverage anymore(gsm areas).

That would cause them to lose a giant amount of customers for no good reason.

They could make it triple cdma/gsm/lte (which I think would be neat), but production costs would likely be too much.
 
Upvote 0
Hmm I think I see what you guys mean but why would it take them so long?
Because they need to make sure gsm or lte is guaranteed to be available in most of the areas that are currently only being served by cdma signals

All they have to do is add the IMEI's for LTE to their tower database so our phones can authenticate it in places where they have LTE and then there they can shut down metropcs LTE in those places that overlap and add that capacity to the main LTE network.
T-mobile has no LTE. MetroPCS IS "the main LTE network". MetroPCS is 100% of the LTE network. :p
So there is no LTE overlap, and they aren't shutting down any LTE.
 
Upvote 0

BEST TECH IN 2023

We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.

Smartphones