Hello everyone. Long time stalker of these forums, first time poster here. I'm one of the many iPhone uers (since launch day 2007) who was extremely dissapointed with Apple's pathetic 4S announcement and am tired of being spoon fed "new featuers" that have been out on other phones for years. Finally ready to make the jump to android.
I'm extremely picky when it comes to UI smoothness since I have been spoiled with iOS, which is what has kept me from switching a long time ago. After playing with the SGSII with the Exynos processor inside, I can finally say android is competitive (if not supperior) in the UI smoothness department (finally!!). My other dilema has been refusal to buy another phone on any other carrier than Verizon since LTE is the future and everyone else is dragging ass on building out their network. It also doesn't help that I live in the sticks and Verizon is the only one with good coverage in my area, although I have been getting by with AT&T (we FINALLY got 3G like 6 months ago... pathetic I know)
Like many on this thread, I was ready to murder anyone wearing red and black when I got the news the function was scrapped and Verizon was passing on a SGSII which lead me to folllowing this thread. So far, definitely a day one buyer no matter the specs, but don't understand the reasoning on some of the rumors.
From what I have gathered, the rumor of it using the OMAP 4460 proc was from early development of ICS and something about it being written based around that processor. I just don't understand why Samsung would choose this processor instead of using one of their own in house Exynos processors which I'm sure they could supply cheaper since they produce them. I have played around a lot with the Bionic, and I'm sorry Bionic owners, but it flat out sucks. Typical Android UI lagginess because the OMAP processor sucks. Read any mobile processor benchmark testing review and you will see that Exynos spanks everything. I believe the 4460, even if clocked at 1.5ghz, will be a downgrade from the 4410 at 1.2Ghz(proc in SGSII). Why would samsung pay more money for a OMAP 4460 when they could use the Exynos 4410? I know that reports are stating the 1.5Ghz Exynos 4412 will not start sampling until Q4 2011, but that is for 3rd party devices not Samsung. Also, if the SGSII HD LTE already is using the 4412, why couldnt the Prime? There are hands on videos of the SGSII HD LTE with the 4412 in it.
I will personally be extremely let down if this device has any type of OMAP processor in it, no matter what it is clocked at. I would even take the Exynos 4410 clocked down to 1Ghz over any OMAP, even if clocked over 1.5ghz. clockrate means nothing, just look at the early days of the AMD intel battles where AMD wiped the floor with intel even when they were clocked sometimes close to twice the clockrate.
I think (more like hoping I guess) that the prime will have the same specs as the Korean SGSII HD LTE, which has the Exynos 4412 clocked at 1.5Ghz, 1GB Ram, 720p Super Amoled HD (pentile unfortunately), 16Gb onboard storage, and an 1850mAh battery. As for the SD expansion slot? I would hope Google/Samsung would have learned from their mistake of leaving it out of the Nexus S, but who knows. It just makes since for Samsung to mass produce devices with the same components to save on costs. Why add a 3rd party OMAP processor to the mix? Guess we will find out Tuesday!!