Nothing that most people would notice. Init.d is a linux concept for run levels. IE. Your computer goes through different phases while booting up or shutting down.
Most init.d support for android is simply a modification to (typing from work so this is off the top of my head) to /system/bin/sysinit (maybe) to execute the scripts in /system/etc/init.d. The script is file is called from the init.rc within the ramdisk when bootup is complete (ie. when the bootanimation is gone).
I believe that's what i had done on this file. I stopped doing anything with it or thinking about it because I rolled all the mods I tended to have to re-apply after a rom flash into one zip (linked in my previous post). Which actually applies a different hack that still leaves the standard init.d support but also adds runlevels for things like once the file system is mounted, once boot is complete, once the bootanimation starts, once it stops, when you choose to shutdown or reboot etc. The enhanced one though actually ended up being more reliable than the one in this thread for even the single run level. The one in this thread doesnt always trigger correctly.
Like I said, really the average user probably wouldn't have much use for these. Unless you need to run something each boot from the terminal. For instance, disabling the capacitive button backlights (menu, home, back) to get rid of the blinding white light. Which is what the disable zip does in this thread.... but it won't work without the init.d one.
If you try these... make a nandroid first... just in case.
TBH I havent tried chameleon... so i have no idea what tweaks/hacks/etc that have been baked into that kang.
Personally, I always swear by the V6 supercharger script. However, keep in mind that it needs init.d support to run. I've seen people who say it does nothing. I've seen plenty of people who love it.
Typically, I can't help but wonder if the people who hate it/say it doesn't do anything actually had init.d enabled. *shrug*.
Either way, I've always noticed more responsiveness in the ui when I use it. YMMV.
Seems like you've gotten pretty comfortable flashing, but make sure you have a good backup and some extra time when you try it. I've tried it twice, both times ended up doing a full wipe and clean ROM flash after to get rid of all the problems it caused. Seems to work great for some people, just saying be aware that it may cause problems too.
Seems like you've gotten pretty comfortable flashing, but make sure you have a good backup and some extra time when you try it. I've tried it twice, both times ended up doing a full wipe and clean ROM flash after to get rid of all the problems it caused. Seems to work great for some people, just saying be aware that it may cause problems too.
If you ever try it again and have it mess your rom up like that again... any chance you could send me a nandroid of the messed up system partition? I'm curious what exactly is going on, even though it's not script.
The only reason that I can think that it might have messed anything up would be a memory size mismatch. IE: you have 512 megs of ram, but set it to use the 1000hp settings. (in case you didn't know the xxxxhp equates to the amount of ram you have). Becuase setting this too high would basically make the phone think it's always out of ram.
Does this CWM image have the date fix built in? I don't really like the idea of a script running every 30 seconds, but would like a CWM with functional date.
I actually quit updating these. I rolled everything into 2 packages into the other thread. That version is actually only supposed to write to the cache once on reboot instead of every thirty seconds. Though, I've been having some issues getting that setup to work for folks.
Tbh, this thread should just be closed/deleted as it won't be maintained.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.