For less money and less influence, not sure why he'd have wanted to take a step down.More like a master of spin IMO. He might have done well in politics.
so.. from what I can see.. it proves that..
Jobs is the a master liar.
also .. since the apple store brings in so much money.
how can they give that up... going with android?
For less money and less influence, not sure why he'd have wanted to take a step down.
So did Reagan.Isn't that what the Governor of California did?
"President Schwarzenegger"...hmm.
time will tell...
it might happen .. but not anytime soon.
in TECH years... a long time.. is longer than 5 yrs.
and I am guessing closer to 10 yrs.. if it happens.
Don't be afraid.is it wrong...
earlymon scares me a little
I knew there was a 75 in there somewhere. I shouldn't post off the top of my head when I'm half asleep lol.Nope, I'm serious.
Look at the revenue wrapup - http://phandroid.com/2015/01/28/apple-q1-2015-results/
And the profits - http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2015/01/27Apple-Reports-Record-First-Quarter-Results.html
Yes, they made a lot of money on the iPhones and sold a lot of them.
$75 billion in revenue - but like every other year - the next quarter the bubble will pop and they're looking at $55 billion, tops. That's going to keep up until next year.
Meanwhile, despite being a huge handset maker - they're continuing to lose market share.
Look at the success they've had with the last two years of iOS changes and this year with the long overdue size changes.
That's just flat copying Android and we all know it.
So if copying Android some gives them revenue spikes, what would happen if they copied Android a lot, as in all the way?
And look at the revenue. It's not coming from hardware sales and it's expensive to fart around with iOS to sell iron.
iTunes for Android - coming.
Android on iPhone - coming right after that.
But what would that accomplish? They might save a few bucks maintaining their Android fork instead of iOS, but I doubt that would be significant. Since iPhone is mostly designed as a gateway to iTunes anyway, wouldn't just opening iTunes up be enough? Being just another Android manufacturer doesn't really do anything for them, and doing an Android-but-not-Android fork isn't much different than just copying Android in iOS like they're doing now. I must be missing something.No moral capitulation would be required.
Just as Kindle devices are a branch based on Android, but focused to the Amazon ecosystem, an Android iPhone could do the exact same thing, pointing to Apple's store alone.
It could carry the same Mickey Mouse app drawer launcher and anything else that they would care to add for nostalgic compatibility.
And completely snow people that they accomplished something unique. Again lmao.
Do the math - look at their profits vs iron sold. Look at their income vs iron sold.
Android for the iPhone is coming.
You can't just open up the app store, the apps have to be made for Android to run on Android.
That's exactly one of the paths I laid out earlier.I'm quite aware of this and didn't in any way mean to suggest otherwise, though I can see why you'd think I did.... I'm thinking along the lines of amazon app store, but Apple doing it instead. No play store access without an incredibly hard root obviously they have to get the apps etc
Tied to your original question, my brother is a iPhone guy and is seriously looking at other handsets since they've decided to up size.
He's a brickie and anything much bigger than the current 5s in his pocket when he's working is too uncomfortable apparently.
His phone is basically a phone and an MP3 player and something to check the football scores when he's out so he doesn't anything bigger.
Tell me Dan - wouldn't you buy an iPhone running Android?
apple is still on top. they sell more Highend smartphones than the others.
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.