I do remember reading about a 4.5" 720p Motorola phone beings rumored for AT&t. I would like to see about that.
Upvote
0
I have a family plan and the second line is eligible for an upgrade. I currently have an Inspire on the primary line (not elible until February 2012 at the earliest if I still have a one-year primary line upgrade, and if not, it would be around July or August of 2012), but I live in Dallas so they have LTE now.
My question is: is it worth going ahead and using the second line upgrade to get the Skyrocket or should I wait until some more LTE options come out in 2012?
There is always something coming up in the next few weeks.
The best you can do is find a phone that suits your needs at the current time.
Its tough to sign up for two years and then see a "better" phone come out 4-6 months later.
Very true. My main thing is getting the LTE capability as my current Inspire obviously does not have it (if I didn't live in a LTE area, I wouldn't even be considering it yet).
I suppose I could always use the second line's upgrade now to get a SR, and my primary line should be eligible for upgrade in the first half of 2012 if something immensely better came out in the next 6-9 months...
Not quite sure from your post, but I think you understand that you can use your upgrade for either phone, on either line. (I stole my wife's upgrade for my S'rocket on my number.)
BTW, this is the second reference I have seen today of a one year upgrade. Is something I have been missing?
1) How do you like the Skyrocket? What phone did you come from?
2) Last time around, I had an upgrade after about 12 months (even though I thought you had to wait around 18 months usually), and I had heard that the primary line on Family Plans became upgrade eligible every 12 months, whereas the rest of the lines generally came up every 18.
I have heard conflicting stories with respect to that though:
a) That they have done away with that and now all lines are generally upgrade eligible every 18-20 months, and
b) That it is dependent upon how many lines you have, how much your monthly bill is, how long you've been with AT&T, etc.
I'm honestly not sure what the real answer is, but those are just the various things I have hear regarding 12-month upgrade periods.
I have the Samsung Infused 4g and is able to get an upgrade. I checked ATT's website and it says that the SR will cost me $150+fee instead of the normal $250.
I haven't had a chance to play with the SR phone yet but heard a lot of great reviews on it. I know it is a good phone but just wondering if it is a big enough upgrade from the Infused.
If I lived in a city with LTE, I wouldn't even bother asking this question and just get it. But since I live in a non-LTE city I wonder if I should just wait.
I don't want to wait too long though because my contracted ended 3 months ago and I don't want to "waste" any more month without getting the update.
So my question is besides the LTE, is there a big enough performance difference between the two?
As for audio i am referring to
1. Excessive feedback through line out while charging
2. Distorted sound
i have had this on every phone ive ever had. moto, lg, sammy, htc iphone.... when charging, especially in a car, there will be feedback. i dont like it, but thats life. havent really noticed it in the house though, so if youre getting it there that is weird.
Engadget:For all its virtues the Optimus LTE falls well short of greatness. For every high there is an equal low; for the wonderful screen there is a distracting dithering issue; for the ridiculous LTE speeds there is disappointing battery life; for the unparalleled performance, a poor camera.
Phone Arena:When stacked side-by-side with the Nitro HD, it's clear Sammy's motherphone is the most deserving of your disposable income. Restrict that playing field down a tier to AT&T's LTE offerings and maybe, just maybe, a compelling argument could be made for LG's featherweight handset.
... in everyday usage still falls short of the zippy Skyrocket. But for all of its spec wins, there's no overlooking the device's greedy power consumption -- a middling seven hour endurance that only the most casual of users wouldn't be affected by. Add to that a $250 two-year on contract price that's identical to the longer-lasting Galaxy S II Skyrocket's and, again, the scales tip in favor of Samsung.
... paltry battery life and sluggish performance.
... there is no exact timeline on when it
Not sure what reviews you've seen but the ones I saw still put the Galaxy S2 Skyrocket ahead of the Nitro.
Mobile Syrup:
Engadget:
Phone Arena:
Good deal. Pretty Mutch matches what most of us decided
At the time of the post the only real reviews that were out were by random folks over at XDA
Hey again, Mr. Ed. Have you been reading the Nitro posts on the XDA forum? Seems the phone is running excellent and even scoring better than the Nexus once rooted/cleaned up. There's a few launchers that speed up the phone dramatically as well.
Although it's looking even better now, the support for this phone is still lacking.
I haven't checked back recently. Did they get through the locked bootloaders?
I didn't find any issues with lag myself. It was the low extra speaker volume that turned me off of it....and I was not overly impressed with the screen
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.