i flashed it without doing that, and it seems to work, the only thing i cant find is the apps2sd gui that you guys show in the pcture
its a dwonload thats on the market. just search a2sdgui
yea def... im going to try it with your ext4 mod, if i ever get the email link.. ..we should include the a2sdgui apk file in this
i flashed it without doing that, and it seems to work, the only thing i cant find is the apps2sd gui that you guys show in the pcture
i'll second that motion...quite excited...on hroark's ext4 rom..clean odin flash then ext4 cache and a fresh format of sd-ext at 2.0 gigs...flashed the new DT script...happy to report it's working like a charm and TB is reporting accurate numbers so far
edit: umm... i did have to mount everything manually though
Works. At least on hroark13 ext4 rom. Apps all go to sd by default.
Now to make it cwm flashable.
I had to manually mount everything in CWM (system, data, sd-ext) and install zip:
your mileage may vary
MEGAUPLOAD - The leading online storage and file delivery service
i'll second that motion...quite excited...on hroark's ext4 rom..clean odin flash then ext4 cache and a fresh format of sd-ext at 2.0 gigs...flashed the new DT script...happy to report it's working like a charm and TB is reporting accurate numbers so far
edit: umm... i did have to mount everything manually though
seems to have moved dalvik-cache no problem
zipalign reports working also although i don't know how to check that
Actually something I too noticed just running the ext4 version. even after customizing all my data and system the way I want I still seemed to use almost 2x as much space. in both system and data.this works better on rfs than ext4 rom.
i duplicated the same set of apps on both file systems and got a lot more free space on the ee14,HK,CWM3,rfs version than the all ext4 rom.
same system (w/shabby 0.9 and royal android 4.1) and 38 user apps installed left 65MB free on ext4, 83 MB free on rfs.
I suppose some of that is the journaling but the difference seems too large for just that. maybe cluster size can be changed or not all parts of /data are moving? i'll test some more later but maybe someone else can see if they get the same results.
this works better on rfs than ext4 rom.
i duplicated the same set of apps on both file systems and got a lot more free space on the ee14,HK,CWM3,rfs version than the all ext4 rom.
same system (w/shabby 0.9 and royal android 4.1) and 38 user apps installed left 65MB free on ext4, 83 MB free on rfs.
I suppose some of that is the journaling but the difference seems too large for just that. maybe cluster size can be changed or not all parts of /data are moving? i'll test some more later but maybe someone else can see if they get the same results.
was there any differemce in speed between the two
RFS is Sumsungs files system, I think if we are ever gonna get Cyanogen or some other non Samsung ROM it will probabally have to be, ext2 or ext4
between ext2 and ext4, i think the ext4 with journaling will be a lot more stable, and if we are able to use apps2sd, space will not be as much as an issue as it is with just using internel memory
no i dont think socan ext2 have journaling?
If, and this is a big if, these ext2-4 are the same as actual linux file systems, ext2 is slower, and no journaling which as you say can lead to file corruption especially on a device that gets turned off with no notice.no i dont think so
if you look at the custom ROMS for other phones, it seems that most of them are using ext2/4
i have no attachment to ext4, i made a test rom with it to see how it would perform, some people left feedback, but a lot of people did not
some of the people that did leave feedback, said it seemed faster
i think the ext2 would probably be a bit faster since there is no journaling, but there would probably be more file corruption
the ext rom "feels" like it's loading apps more quickly even though i have no hard data on it. it definitely booted more quickly in this scenario. by about 25 seconds, actually, so the performance boost is more than just a perception.
how can i put the /system, /cache and /data in ext2 and see how that works out?
edit: guess that's why you gave those repack instructions. haven't had time to install that ubuntu yet but i'm looking forward to. i'm a mechanic by trade so this is worlds away from my everyday but i like the brain stretching.
i use this code... 4 cache not sure about data... but maybe u can switch this up 2 do the same thing for data... mounts the cache & links it 2 cache/download. then removes the download file when u download a app...#!/system/bin/sh
#
# bind mount /data/local/download to /cache/download if cache
# partition is too small
#
CACHESIZE=$(df -k /cache | tail -n1 | tr -s ' ' | cut -d ' ' -f2)
if [ $CACHESIZE -lt 20000 ]
then
mount -o bind /data/local/download /cache/download
fi
rm /cache/download/downloadfile*.apk >/dev/null 2>&1
exit 0
We've been tracking upcoming products and ranking the best tech since 2007. Thanks for trusting our opinion: we get rewarded through affiliate links that earn us a commission and we invite you to learn more about us.