Is that number supposed to go anywhere? I got the Verizon recording claiming my number could not be completed as dialed. Or is your carrier recording the one you're listening to?
not supposed to go anywhere. although if the message is carrier dependent, it might not be an accurate test i'm just nit picking here. The message I heard did have quite a bit of built-in hiss. just saying.
nothing speical with 800-000-0000; it is just an invalid phone number so you get the normal "cant' complete call" recording.... any invalid # will do (I think).
"While the Evo 3D has several strong points, working as a phone isn't one of them. Voices on calls made to both land lines and cellphones weren't crystal clear, although they were serviceable. Making a phone call with any outside noise was difficult. Sprint says it hasn't experienced problems with the call quality."
Well they also had problems with the device as a phone:
-
While the Evo 3D has several strong points, working as a phone isn't one of them. Voices on calls made to both land lines and cellphones weren't crystal clear, although they were serviceable. Making a phone call with any outside noise was difficult. Sprint says it hasn't experienced problems with the call quality.
-
Not looking good (as a phone)
Thats interesting, thats the 2nd review I read that said call quality was not very good. I have the evo and the call quality on my phone is very good, not perfect, but very good, no problems, this concerns me. I mean It may be a great performer, but if it struggles with phone calls, that might be a problem...
In that review, they say the call quality is better than the Evo 4G. Guess I'll just buy it and see. I can always return it for something else if I have to
Okay, some of you are acting ridiculous. Go to the store to pick up your EVO 3D and once they activate it make a few calls as the rep types away on their computer. If the call quality blows just hand the phone back. Sitting here and worrying about call quality isn't necessary.
As a guy who has to take a depth perception test every year. If you look at 3D images long enough it will actually strengthen your eyes. I had to look at 3D images printed off from a website so my eyes knew what to look for on the test at the docs office. I always ace my depth perception test.
What they said on battery life for the evo 3d on engadget makes no sense.. They said it got almost 15 hours out of "barely using it," yet it only slept 6 hours. That sounds like medium-heavy use to me. In addition, if you look at their Galaxy S2 review, they appeared to love it and thought the battery life was fantastic, yet looking at the battery chart that they have pictured it was nearly drained in 12 hours. They sum it up to the screen "being so brilliant" or something.
I have a lot of questions about these reviewers. If you tested my EVO in my building at work you would mark the EVO down on call quality. Well, a the military building I work in isn't nice for cell phone reception. But once you get next to a window, door, or go outside no more problems. Did they test the phones in buildings? Outside? How many bars did they have?
I really wanted to like the 3D, but after reading all these reviews maybe the Galaxy S2 is the better phone for me. My main concerns are battery life, camera quality, call quality, and screen quality. It seems like there are mixed opinions on the screen and camera, and mostly bad feeling about the battery and call quality. Im still going to check it out at Sprint, but I gotta say Im a little disappointed.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.